DOI: | Full Text: [PDF]

Physiological and transcriptomic analysis of a salt-resistant Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant obtained by evolutionary engineering

Seyma Hande Tekarslan-Sahin, Ceren Alkim, Tugba Sezgin


Salt-resistant yeast strains are highly demanded by industry due to the exposure of yeast cells to high concentrations of salt, in various industrial bioprocesses. The aim of this study was to perform a physiological and transcriptomic analysis of a salt-resistant Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae) mutant generated by evolutionary engineering. NaCl-resistant S. cerevisiae strains were obtained by ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) mutagenesis followed by successive batch cultivations in the presence of gradually increasing NaCl concentrations, up to 8.5% w/v of NaCl (1.45 M). The most probable number (MPN) method, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and glucose oxidase/peroxidase method were used for physiological analysis, while Agilent yeast DNA microarray systems were used for transcriptome analysis. NaCl-resistant mutant strain T8 was highly cross-resistant to LiCl and highly sensitive to AlCl3. In the absence of NaCl stress, T8 strain had significantly higher trehalose and glycogen levels compared to the reference strain. Global transcriptome analysis by means of DNA microarrays showed that the genes related to stress response, carbohydrate transport, glycogen and trehalose biosynthesis, as well as biofilm formation, were upregulated. According to gene set enrichment analysis, 548 genes were upregulated and 22 downregulated in T8 strain, compared to the reference strain. Among the 548 upregulated genes, the highest upregulation was observed for the FLO11 (MUC1) gene (92-fold that of the reference strain). Overall, evolutionary engineering by chemical mutagenesis and increasing NaCl concentrations is a promising approach in developing industrial strains for biotechnological applications.


Evolutionary engineering; transcriptome analysis; NaCl-resistance; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; stress resistance; industrial strains

Full Text:



Attfield PV. Stress tolerance: The key to effective strains of industrial baker's yeast. Nat Biotechnol 1997;15(13):1351-7.

Dhar R, Sägesser R, Weikert C, Yuan J, Wagner A. Adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to saline stress through laboratory evolution. J Evol Biol 2011;24(5):1135-53.

Posas F, Chambers JR, Heyman JA, Hoeffler JP, de Nadal E, Ariño J. The transcriptional response of yeast to saline stress. J Biol Chem 2000;275(23):17249-55.

Melamed D, Pnueli L, Arava Y. Yeast translational response to high salinity: Global analysis reveals regulation at multiple levels. RNA 2008;14(7):1337-51.

Bañuelos MA, Ruiz MC, Jiménez A, Souciet JL, Potier S, Ramos J. Role of the Nha1 antiporter in regulating K(+) influx in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 2002;19(1):9-15.

Serrano R, Rodriguez-Navarro A. Ion homeostasis during salt stress in plants. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2001;13(4):399-404.

Cyert MS, Philpott CC. Regulation of cation balance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2013;193(3):677-713.

Hunte C, Screpanti E, Venturi M, Rimon A, Padan E, Michel H. Structure of a Na+/H+ antiporter and insights into mechanism of action and regulation by pH. Nature 2005;435(7046):1197-202.

Kinclova-Zimmermannova O, Gaskova D, Sychrova H. The Na+, K+/H+-antiporter Nha1 influences the plasma membrane potential of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 2006;6(5):792-800.

Mager WH, Siderius M. Novel insights into the osmotic stress response of yeast. FEMS Yeast Res 2002;2(3):251-7.

François JM, Walther T, Parrou JL. Genetics and regulation of glycogen and trehalose metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In: Liu ZL, editor. Microbial Stress Tolerance for Biofuels. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2012. p. 29-55.

Patnaik R. Engineering complex phenotypes in industrial strains. Biotechnol Prog 2008;24(1):38-47.

Koppram R, Albers E, Olsson L. Evolutionary engineering strategies to enhance tolerance of xylose utilizing recombinant yeast to inhibitors derived from spruce biomass. Biotechnol Biofuels 2012;5(1):32.

Cakar ZP, Seker UO, Tamerler C, Sonderegger M, Sauer U. Evolutionary engineering of multiple-stress resistant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 2005;5(6-7):569-78.

Cakar ZP, Alkim C, Turanli B, Tokman N, Akman S, Sarikaya M, et al. Isolation of cobalt hyper-resistant mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by in vivo evolutionary engineering approach. J Biotechnol 2009;143(2):130-8.

Küçükgöze G, Alkım C, Yılmaz Ü, Kısakesen HI, Gündüz S, Akman S, et al. Evolutionary engineering and molecular characterization of nickel-resistant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 2013;13(8):731-46.

Alkim C, Benbadis L, Yilmaz U, Cakar ZP, François JM. Mechanisms other than activation of the iron regulon account for the hyper-resistance to cobalt of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain obtained by evolutionary engineering. Metallomics 2013;5(8):1043-60.

Sezgin T. Evolutionary Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for Improved Industrial Properties. [PhD Thesis]. Turkey: Istanbul Technical University; 2010. p. 124.

Tekarslan SH, Alkım C, Hunte C, Cakar ZP. Physiological and genetic analysis of cellular sodium and lithium response/resistance behavior using the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model organism. Istanb J Pharm 2015;45(2):165-79.

Entian KD, Kötter P. 25 yeast genetic strain and plasmid collections. Meth Microbiol 2007;36:629-66.

Russek E, Colwell RR. Computation of most probable numbers. Appl Environ Microbiol 1983;45(5):1646-50.

Parrou JL, François J. A simplified procedure for a rapid and reliable assay of both glycogen and trehalose in whole yeast cells. Anal Biochem 1997;248(1):186-8.

Cramp DG. New automated method for measuring glucose by glucose oxidase. J Clin Pathol 1967;20(6):910-2.

Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 1995;57(1):289-300.

Robinson MD, Grigull J, Mohammad N, Hughes TR. FunSpec: A web-based cluster interpreter for yeast. BMC Bioinformatics 2002;3:35.

Ruepp A, Zollner A, Maier D, Albermann K, Hani J, Mokrejs M, et al. The FunCat, a functional annotation scheme for systematic classification of proteins from whole genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32(18):5539-45.

Braus GH, Grundmann O, Brückner S, Mösch HU. Amino acid starvation and Gcn4p regulate adhesive growth and FLO11 gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 2003;14(10):4272-84.

Gerstein AC, Chun HJ, Grant A, Otto SP. Genomic convergence toward diploidy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 2006;2(9):e145.

Wisselink HW, Torikens MJ, Wu Q, Pronk JT, van Maris AJ. Novel evolutionary engineering approach for accelerated utilization of glucose, xylose, and arabinose mixtures by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009;75(4):907-14.

Stanley D, Bandara A, Fraser S, Chambers PJ, Stanley GA. The ethanol stress response and ethanol tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Appl Microbiol 2010;109(1):13-24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04657.x.

Kutyna DR, Varela C, Stanley GA, Borneman AR, Henschke PA, Chambers PJ. Adaptive evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to generate strains with enhanced glycerol production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2012;93(3):1175-84.

Wenger JW, Piotrowski J, Nagarajan S, Chiotti K, Sherlock G, Rosenzweig F. Hunger artists: Yeast adapted to carbon limitation show trade-offs under carbon sufficiency. PLoS Genet 2011;7:e1002202.

MacDiarmid CW, Gardner RC. Overexpression of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae magnesium transport system confers resistance to aluminum ion. J Biol Chem 1998;273(3):1727-32.

Li C, Xu Y, Jiang W, Dong X, Wang D, Liu B. Effect of NaCl on the heavy metal tolerance and bioaccumulation of Zygosaccharomyces rouxii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioresour Technol 2013;143:46-52.

Masuda CA, Ramírez J, Peña A, Montero-Lomelí M. Regulation of monovalent ion homeostasis and pH by the Ser-Thr protein phosphatase SIT4 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 2000;275(40):30957-61.

Gasch AP, Spellman PT, Kao CM, Carmel-Harel O, Eisen MB, Storz G, et al. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell 2000;11(12):4241-57.

Marešová L, Sychrová H. Genetic interactions among the Arl1 GTPase and intracellular Na+/H+ antiporters in pH homeostasis and cation detoxification. FEMS Yeast Res 2010;10(7):802-11.

Garciadeblas B, Rubio F, Quintero FJ, Bañuelos MA, Haro R, Rodríguez-Navarro A. Differential expression of two genes encoding isoforms of the ATPase involved in sodium efflux in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet 1993;236(2-3):363-8.

Wieland J, Nitsche AM, Strayle J, Steiner H, Rudolph HK. The PMR2 gene cluster encodes functionally distinct isoforms of a putative Na+ pump in the yeast plasma membrane. EMBO J 1995;14(16):3870-82.

Daran-Lapujade P, Daran JM, Luttik MA, Almering MJ, Pronk JT, Kotter P. An atypical PMR2 locus is responsible for hypersensitivity to sodium and lithium cations in the laboratory strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae CEN.PK113-7D. FEMS Yeast Res 2009;9(5):789-92.

Blomberg A. Metabolic surprises in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during adaptation to saline conditions: Questions, some answers and a model. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2000;182(1):1-8.

Bubnová M, Zemancíková J, Sychrová H. Osmotolerant yeast species differ in basic physiological parameters and in tolerance of non-osmotic stresses. Yeast 2014;31(8):309-21.

Zara G, Zara S, Pinna C, Marceddu S, Budroni M. FLO11 gene length and transcriptional level affect biofilm-forming ability of wild flor strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 2009;155(Pt 12):3838-46.

Kobayashi N, McEntee K. Evidence for a heat shock transcription factor-independent mechanism for heat shock induction of transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990;87(17):6550-4.

O'Rourke SM, Herskowitz I, O'Shea EK. Yeast go the whole HOG for the hyperosmotic response. Trends Genet 2002;18(8):405-12.

Claro FB, Rijsbrack K, Soares EV. Flocculation onset in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Effect of ethanol, heat and osmotic stress. J Appl Microbiol 2007;102(3):693-700.

Pir P, Gutteridge A, Wu J, Rash B, Kell DB, Zhang N, et al. The genetic control of growth rate: A systems biology study in yeast. BMC Syst Biol 2012;6:4.

Gutteridge A, Pir P, Castrillo JI, Charles PD, Lilley KS, Oliver SG. Nutrient control of eukaryote cell growth: A systems biology study in yeast. BMC Biol 2010;8:68.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Quick links for Authors:Quick links for Peer Reviewers:

Advanced online | Current Issue | Archives | Submit a manuscript | About the Journal

© Association of Basic Medical Sciences of FBIH, 1998-2018. Credits to Public Knowledge Project