Effects of caffeine administration on sedation and respiratory parameters in patients recovering from anesthesia

Authors

  • Nafisseh S Warner Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  • Matthew A Warner Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  • Darrel R Schroeder Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  • Juraj Sprung Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  • Toby N Weingarten Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17305/bjbms.2018.2434

Keywords:

Caffeine, respiratory insufficiency, anesthesia, sedation, recovery

Abstract

Caffeine has been shown to enhance the speed of recovery from general anesthesia in murine models, though data in human patients is lacking. This is a retrospective review of intravenous caffeine administration (median dose 150 [125, 250] mg) to 151 heavily sedated patients in the post-anesthesia recovery area, to determine the association between caffeine administration and changes in sedation score, respiratory rate, and oxyhemoglobin saturation. Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score, respiratory rate, and oxyhemoglobin saturation values were obtained during the 90-minute period prior to and following caffeine administration. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) with explanatory variables of time, caffeine, and the time-by-caffeine interaction were created to assess changes in the variables of interest after caffeine administration. Following the administration of caffeine, the RASS scores increased (estimate = 0.57, SE = 0.14, p < 0.001) but a trend over time or in the interaction effect was not observed, suggesting that the changes in RASS were not solely due to the recovery from anesthesia over time. No association was found between caffeine administration and changes in respiratory parameters. No adverse cardiac events were observed. Our data suggests that intravenous caffeine may enhance the speed of recovery following general anesthesia, though future prospective trials are necessary to define the optimal dose and timing of administration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nafisseh S Warner, Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Department of Anesthesiology

Matthew A Warner, Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Department of Anesthesiology

Darrel R Schroeder, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics

Juraj Sprung, Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Department of Anesthesiology

Toby N Weingarten, Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Department of Anesthesiology

References

Fredholm BB. Astra award lecture. Adenosine, adenosine receptors and the actions of caffeine. Pharmacol Toxicol 1995;76(2):93-101.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0773.1995.tb00111.x.

National Academies Press (US). Caffeine for the Sustainment of Mental Task Performance: Formulations for Military Operations. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2001.

Ker K, Edwards PJ, Felix LM, Blackhall K, Roberts I. Caffeine for the prevention of injuries and errors in shift workers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;5:CD008508. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008508.

Wang Q, Fong R, Mason P, Fox AP, Xie Z. Caffeine accelerates recovery from general anesthesia. J Neurophysiol 2014;111(6):1331-40. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00792.2013.

Weber JG, Klindworth JT, Arnold JJ, Danielson DR, Ereth MH. Prophylactic intravenous administration of caffeine and recovery after ambulatory surgical procedures. Mayo Clin Proc 1997;72(7):621-6.

https://doi.org/10.4065/72.7.621; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-6196(11)63567-2.

D’Urzo AD, Jhirad R, Jenne H, Avendano MA, Rubinstein I, D’Costa M, et al. Effect of caffeine on ventilatory responses to hypercapnia, hypoxia, and exercise in humans. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1990;68(1):322-8. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1990.68.1.322.

Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, Brophy GM, O’Neal PV, Keane KA, et al. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: Validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166(10):1338-44. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.2107138.

Aldrete JA, Kroulik D. A postanesthetic recovery score. Anesth Analg 1970;49(6):924-34. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-197011000-00020.

Gali B, Whalen FX, Schroeder DR, Gay PC, Plevak DJ. Identification of patients at risk for postoperative respiratory complications using a preoperative obstructive sleep apnea screening tool and postanesthesia care assessment. Anesthesiology 2009;110(4):869-77. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819b5d70.

Rang HP, Dale MM, Ritter JM, Flower RJ. Rang and Dale’s Pharmacology. 6th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2007.

Lazarus M, Shen HY, Cherasse Y, Qu WM, Huang ZL, Bass CE, et al. Arousal effect of caffeine depends on adenosine A2A receptors in the shell of the nucleus accumbens. J Neurosci 2011;31(27):10067-75. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6730-10.2011.

Fong R, Khokhar S, Chowdhury AN, Xie KG, Wong JH, Fox AP, et al. Caffeine accelerates recovery from general anesthesia via multiple pathways. J Neurophysiol 2017;118(3):1591-7. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00393.2017.

Effects of caffeine administration on sedation and respiratory parameters in patients recovering from anesthesia

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2018-02-20

How to Cite

1.
Warner NS, Warner MA, Schroeder DR, Sprung J, Weingarten TN. Effects of caffeine administration on sedation and respiratory parameters in patients recovering from anesthesia. Biomol Biomed [Internet]. 2018Feb.20 [cited 2023Jun.6];18(1):101-4. Available from: https://www.bjbms.org/ojs/index.php/bjbms/article/view/2434

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 1 (2018)

Section

Translational and Clinical Research

INTRODUCTION

Caffeine, a mild central nervous system stimulant, exerts its effect vis-à-vis antagonism of the adenosine receptors with a resultant increase in dopaminergic activity [1]. In moderate doses, it enhances cognitive function and alertness [2,3]. A murine model found caffeine expedites recovery following both isoflurane- and propofol-based anesthetics [4]. Caffeine administration has been shown to decrease symptoms of acute caffeine withdrawal during anesthetic recovery [5], but otherwise has not been well studied if it can hasten anesthetic recovery. At our institution, several practitioners have developed an informal practice of administering intravenous caffeine to heavily sedated patients in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Despite anecdotal reports of improved alertness, this practice has not been audited. The aim of this study was to review the course of these patients to determine if caffeine administration was associated with improvement in consciousness. Ultimately, this would help determine the feasibility of designing a prospective trial. Because caffeine also increases resting ventilation and augments the ventilatory response to hypercapnia and hypoxia [6], a secondary aim of this study was to determine associated changes in respiratory rate (RR) or oxyhemoglobin saturation (SpO2) following caffeine administration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study is representative of the surgical practice of the two major hospitals (St Mary’s Hospital and Rochester Methodist Hospital) within the Mayo Clinic Rochester Practice, a tertiary-referral academic institution, from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2014. This study was approved by the local Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board and, consistent with Minnesota Statute 144.295, only patients who provided authorization for research use of their medical records were included.

Patient selection

The electronic anesthetic database was queried to identify patients who were admitted to the PACU for Phase I recovery from general anesthesia and administered intravenous caffeine. Patients who were under 18 years of age or who underwent obstetric, cardiothoracic or cardiac catheterization procedures were excluded.

PACU clinical practice and discharge criteria

The PACU is staffed by registered nurses trained in Phase I anesthesia recovery with an attending anesthesiologist immediately available. The larger PACU (St Marys Hospital) is also staffed by an anesthesia resident. Vital signs including RR and oxyhemoglobin saturation as measured by pulse oximetry are automatically recorded every 5 minutes into the electronic medical record. Consciousness is assessed using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) [7] upon admission and discharge from the PACU as well as clinically indicated (e.g., in a heavily sedated patient). The RASS is an assessment tool to quantify the degree of sedation or agitation and is scored on a 10-point scale from -5 (unarousable) to + 4 (combative) with a score of 0 that equates an alert and calm patient [7]. Discharge criteria for Phase I recovery were primarily based on standard discharge criteria [8], goal pain scores and control of postoperative nausea, as well as specific measures of respiratory depression, as previously described [9].

The practice of caffeine administration is informal. Decision regarding its use is left to the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist based on clinical judgement. At the study institution, intravenous caffeine is available as caffeine sodium benzoate (125 mg caffeine, 125 mg sodium benzoate per ml).

Data abstraction

Medical, surgical, and anesthesia records were electronically abstracted. Variables included patient age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status, type of surgery, surgical duration, and the dose and timing of caffeine administration. Outcome measures were RASS score, RR, and oxyhemoglobin saturation before and after caffeine administration.

Statistical analysis

The clinical variables of interest were RASS score, RR, and oxyhemoglobin saturation. In all cases, values obtained during the 90-minute period prior to and following caffeine administration were included in the analysis. For each measurement of a given clinical variable, a binary variable, “caffeine”, was created indicating whether the measurement was from before (0) or after (1) the patient received caffeine, and a variable, “time”, was created which corresponded to the time in minutes from the administration of caffeine to the given measurement (possible values ranged from −90 to +90). In order to accommodate repeated measures within patients, the clinical variables were analyzed using generalized estimating equations (GEE) with explanatory variables of time, caffeine, and the time-by-caffeine interaction. From this model, the coefficient for “time” corresponds to the slope of the clinical variable over time prior to the administration of caffeine, the coefficient for “caffeine” corresponds to a shift in the mean of the clinical variable following the administration of caffeine, and the “time-by-caffeine” interaction corresponds to a change in the slope following the administration of caffeine. Two-tailed p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed with JMP Pro 9.0.1 and SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Inc.).

RESULTS

During the study timeframe, 151 patients were identified who were administered intravenous caffeine during Phase I recovery. The median dose was 150 (25%, 75% quartiles, 125, 250) mg of caffeine sodium benzoate. The patients were characterized by a mean age of 58 ± 14 years, 67 (44%) male sex, 101 (67%) ASA I-II, and underwent surgery with a mean duration of 141 ± 86 minutes. Patients underwent the following surgical procedures: 42 (28%) orthopedic, 41 (27%) general surgical, 27 (18%) gynecological/urological, 15 (10%) head or neck, 11 (7%) neurosurgical, 9 (6%) thoracic, 5 (3%) plastic, and 1 (1%) vascular procedure.

Prior to the administration of caffeine, there was no meaningful trend in RASS scores over time (slope = 0.003, SE = 0.003, p = 0.25). Following the administration of caffeine RASS scores were significantly increased (estimate = 0.57, SE = 0.14, p < 0.001), with no evidence of a change in the slope (interaction effect = −0.0003, SE = 0.004, p = 0.93), (Figure 1, bottom panel). There was no significant association between the dose of caffeine administered and change in RASS score (R2 = 0.014, p = 0.156). Similarly, there was no association between the type of surgical procedure and change in RASS score following caffeine administration (p = 0.989). Twenty (13%) patients had their RASS scores become >0 with 19 having a score of +1 and 1 with a score of + 2. There was a meaningful trend in RR over time (slope = 0.011, SE = 0.004, p = 0.014), but following caffeine administration there was no increase in the rate (estimate = 0.506, SE = 0.283, p = 0.074) or change in the slope (interaction effect = −0.006, SE = 0.008, p = 0.426), (Figure 1, top panel). There was no meaningful trend in oxyhemoglobin saturation over time (slope = −0.004, SE = 0.004, p = 0.250), or following caffeine administration (estimate = 0.336, SE = 0.200, p = 0.346), (Figure 1, top panel). No adverse cardiac events were noted, including tachyarrhythmia or myocardial ischemia.

FIGURE 1: Caffeine administration and associated changes in sedation score and respiratory parameters in heavily sedated post-surgical patients. The dotted line represents the timing of the administration of caffeine (0 minute). The degree of sedation is quantified by the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) and is represented by circles (mean, standard deviation). Respiratory parameters are quantified by oxyhemoglobin saturation (represented by diamonds) and RR (represented by squares).

DISCUSSION

This study found an association between the administration of caffeine and an increase in RASS scores in post-surgical patients. Whether these changes were secondary to caffeine administration or the natural course of anesthetic recovery is uncertain, however, an effect is suggested as there was no meaningful trend in RASS scores over time. Notably, these findings are consistent with murine models assessing the impact of caffeine on emergence from general anesthesia [4,10]. Caffeine sodium benzoate, the intravenous caffeine formulation used in this study, contains 125 mg of caffeine and 125 of sodium benzoate per ml (250 mg total dose per ml), with sodium benzoate serving to increase the solubility of caffeine. Caffeine competitively inhibits phosphodiesterase, resulting in increased intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels [10]. Additionally, caffeine serves as an adenosine receptor antagonist [11]. Both adenosine inhibition and increased cAMP are thought to mediate the stimulatory effects of caffeine on the central nervous system, which in turn may be associated with enhanced recovery from general anesthesia [12]. As an example, a previous murine model found 60% reduction in recovery time from 2% isoflurane anesthesia with the administration of 25 mg/kg of intravenous caffeine [4]. At this time, similar studies in human subjects are lacking.

Based upon results from this investigation, a prospective trial of caffeine versus placebo for emergence from general anesthesia may be designed. To conduct such a study with the primary endpoint being change in RASS score, a sample-size of N = 60 patients per group would provide statistical power (two-tailed, alpha = 0.05) of 80% to detect a differential change between groups of 0.5 units. While no adverse cardiac events were noted following caffeine administration, a substantial number of patients did exhibit signs of restlessness with one even experiencing agitation following its administration. There was no demonstrable association between caffeine administration and change in respiratory parameters. This is in contrast with a human study where 650 mg of oral caffeine was shown to be a respiratory stimulant [6]; however, the doses used clinically in this study (equivalent to 1-2 cups of coffee) were considerably lower.

There are several notable limitations to this investigation. First, this is a retrospective evaluation of caffeine administration to a diverse cohort of surgical patients. Caffeine administration was given at the discretion of the covering anesthesiologist rather than by protocol. Additionally, caffeine may have been given for reasons other than excessive sedation (e.g., headache). No baseline information was available on preoperative caffeine consumption, and it is possible that responses to caffeine postoperatively may be influenced by preoperative caffeine consumption. Most notably, this pilot study is limited by the absence of a control group of similarly sedated patients that did not receive caffeine postoperatively. Hence, it is unclear if trends in RASS improvement following caffeine were truly related to the intervention. Future studies utilizing a comparative drug or placebo would be tremendously helpful in further assessing the impact of caffeine on arousal following general anesthesia. Furthermore, this study was not designed to analyze adverse events related to caffeine administration, including drug-drug interactions or direct caffeine-induced adverse effects. However, we did review patient records for the presence of tachyarrhythmia or cardiac ischemia following caffeine administration, finding no evidence for either. Lastly, we did not review the impact of the type of anesthesia (including specific anesthetic agents) on responses to caffeine administration. Future studies would benefit by standardization of perioperative anesthetic techniques.

CONCLUSION

In this audit of intravenous caffeine administration for heavily-sedated patients in the post-anesthesia recovery unit following general anesthesia, caffeine administration was associated with increased RASS scores but no changes in RR or oxyhemoglobin saturation. This data may prove useful in the design of prospective evaluations to assess the impact of caffeine on recovery from general anesthesia, with particular emphasis on the optimal dose and timing of administration and adverse effects.

DECLARATION OF INTERESTS

Dr. Weingarten currently serves as a consultant to Medtronic in the role as chairman of the Clinical Endpoint Committee for the Prodigy Trial; has received research support from Respiratory Motion (study equipment) and unrestricted investigator-initiated grant from Merck. The other authors declare no conflict of interests.

REFERENCES

  1. (). Astra award lecture. Adenosine, adenosine receptors and the actions of caffeine. Pharmacol Toxicol. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0773.1995.tb00111.x
  2. (). . Caffeine for the Sustainment of Mental Task Performance: Formulations for Military Operations.
  3. , , , , (). Caffeine for the prevention of injuries and errors in shift workers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008508
  4. , , , , (). Caffeine accelerates recovery from general anesthesia. J Neurophysiol. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00792.2013
  5. , , , , (). Prophylactic intravenous administration of caffeine and recovery after ambulatory surgical procedures. Mayo Clin Proc. https://doi.org/10.4065/72.7.621; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-6196(11)63567-2
  6. , , , , , (). Effect of caffeine on ventilatory responses to hypercapnia, hypoxia, and exercise in humans. J Appl Physiol (1985). DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1990.68.1.322
  7. , , , , , (). The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: Validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.2107138
  8. , (). A postanesthetic recovery score. Anesth Analg. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-197011000-00020
  9. , , , , (). Identification of patients at risk for postoperative respiratory complications using a preoperative obstructive sleep apnea screening tool and postanesthesia care assessment. Anesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819b5d70
  10. , , , (). . Rang and Dale’s Pharmacology.
  11. , , , , , (). Arousal effect of caffeine depends on adenosine A2A receptors in the shell of the nucleus accumbens. J Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6730-10.2011
  12. , , , , , (). Caffeine accelerates recovery from general anesthesia via multiple pathways. J Neurophysiol. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00393.2017